Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen's avatar

Appreciate the effort you put into this piece Andrew ... thanks!

Hugo s/b considered a replacement for Darwin, i.e. not a starter, given he's young (23yo) & unproven in the EPL/UCL. It's a bet on his potential. That said, he's already a big upgrade on Darwin given the way Arne wants us to play.

Your data for carries into the area & dribbles didn't show Darwin, probably bc he didn't excel at either. He could produce only if (1) a ball was played into space, and (2) he outran an opposing defender to it before (3) an accurate shot or pass. When a ball was played to Darwin & an opposing defender got goal-side on him, he rarely produced (lacking the technical skills & tactical sense to threaten).

Hugo can produce, as Darwin did, by outrunning his opponents to balls into space. In contrast, he also excels in carries & dribbles, producing even if his marker is goal-side. Additionally, he's more of an all-arounder, contributing more than Darwin in build-up & progression. His "floor" s/b an improvement on Darwin this season and, if he develops, a big upside potential ceiling.

But I hope he's not seen this season as a part of the XI (a big risk given our ambitions). If Hughes can get Isak in the door, it'll improve upon Luis' contribution and we'll have 4 elite-to-strong senior forwards with some combination of others (Dom, Jeremie, Rio, Ben) to provide squad depth.

No posts

Ready for more?